Shock Syndromes I
iv.
The Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock (APROCCHSS) trial
randomized 1241 patients to hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone or placebo within 24 hours of
shock onset. Patients were also randomized to drotrecogin alfa (activated) in a 2 x 2 factorial
design, but after the drug was withdrawn from the market, the study was continued with only the
corticosteroid randomization. Patients in the hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone group had lower
90-day mortality than those receiving placebo (43.0% vs. 49.1%; RR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78–0.99;
p=0.03). In addition, patients randomized to the corticosteroid arm had increased vasopressor-
free days (16 vs. 11 days; p<0.001) and organ failure–free days (14 vs. 13 days; p=0.003).
These studies differed in the patient populations evaluated, with patients more severely ill
demonstrating a mortality benefit from corticosteroids. When this question was specifically
evaluated in the ADRENAL trial, there was no heterogeneity of effect by subgroup, suggesting
severity of illness did not influence the outcome.
vi.
Other notable differences between studies that may account for the disparate results are the
drug regimens used and the timing of therapy initiation.
Two meta-analyses that included these four studies found that corticosteroids had no mortality
benefit (RR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.91–1.02 in one meta-analysis and RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.84–1.03 in another
meta-analysis).
In meta-analyses, corticosteroid administration has consistently been associated with improvements
in shock reversal and a higher incidence of adverse effects (particularly hypernatremia and
hyperglycemia).
A recent evaluation using the Premier Healthcare Database evaluated the addition of fludrocortisone
to hydrocortisone compared with hydrocortisone alone in patients with septic shock and found
lower rates of the primary composite outcome of in-hospital death or discharge to hospice (47.2%
vs. 50.8%; adjusted risk difference: –3.7% 95% confidence –4.2% to –3.1%) in the group of
patients who received fludrocortisone. Additional data are needed to confirm the findings from
this retrospective evaluation and definitively determine if the addition of fludrocortisone to the
standard regimen of hydrocortisone is necessary.
Medicine suggest using corticosteroids in patients with septic shock. These guidelines further state
that if hydrocortisone is indicated, a dose of less than 400 mg/day for 3 days or more at full dose
is suggested.
The SSC guidelines suggest using hydrocortisone in patients with septic shock and an ongoing
requirement for vasopressor therapy at a dose of 200 mg/day given as either 50 mg intravenously
every 6 hours or a continuous infusion. The guidelines note the suggestion that hydrocortisone be
initiated when norepinephrine or epinephrine doses exceed 0.25 mcg/kg/minute at least 4 hours
after initiation.
Although two of the randomized controlled trials mentioned earlier used fludrocortisone,
the SSC guidelines recommend hydrocortisone alone. This is likely because of the COIITSS
study, a 2 x 2 factorial trial that compared hydrocortisone in combination with fludrocortisone
with hydrocortisone alone. No difference in the primary outcome of in-hospital death (42.9%
hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone vs. 45.8% hydrocortisone alone) or other clinical outcomes was
detected between treatment arms.
| k. | Because of immunoassay imprecision and the inconsistent benefit of identifying patient response, |
|---|
the ACTH test should not be used to identify patients for corticosteroid administration.