Hepatic Failure/GI/Endocrine Emergencies
| d. | If clinically significant bleeding occurs, INR correction with fresh frozen plasma is warranted. |
|---|
Guidelines recommend an INR correction to about 1.5 for clinically significant bleeding.
ii.
If a fresh frozen plasma infusion alone does not adequately lower INR, recombinant activated
factor VII (rFVIIa) may be administered. In a small nonrandomized study of 15 patients
with fulminant hepatic failure, administration of rFVIIa at a dose of 40 mcg/kg temporarily
improved coagulation parameters (i.e., INR less than 1.6) compared with patients receiving only
fresh frozen plasma (100% vs. 0%, p<0.002). Although the improvements in coagulation were
only temporary, patients in the rFVIIa group were able to have invasive procedures performed
(e.g., ICP monitors placed) more often than were patients in the control group (100% vs. 38%,
p=0.03).
iii.
Data are limited on use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) for reversing coagulopathy
in ALF; however, it appears to be similar in efficacy to rFVIIa. A retrospective study in patients
with cirrhosis found similar rates of INR reversal (1.5 or less) in patients who received either
PCC (80%; p=0.03) and rFVIIa (87%; p=0.04), compared with FFP (27%). Therefore, PCC may
be an option in cases for which the goal is to limit volume associated with FFP; however, INR-
based dosing limits this use, and further study is warranted.
To reduce the risk of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage, platelet transfusions should be provided
if the count drops to less than 15,000β20,000/mm3 in the absence of bleeding.
If clinically significant bleeding occurs, patients should be transfused to a target platelet count
greater than 50,000/mm3.
ii.
For invasive procedures, platelet counts should be 50,000β70,000/mm3 to prevent bleeding,
though thromboelastography data analyses suggest that a target of 100,000/mm3 is ideal.
Patients with ALF should be evaluated for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis based on
traditional risk assessments (e.g., thrombocytopenia, recent and/or active bleeding, etc). Venous
thromboembolism prophylaxis should not be withheld due to elevated INR because INR often
overestimates hypercoaguability in patients with ALF. Selection of agent for prophylaxis is unclear.
No studies have compared low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin in patients
with ALF; however, most studies of patients with cirrhosis support the use of LMWH, though the
control group is no-prophylaxis.
Histamine-2 receptor antagonists or PPIs should be initiated in patients with ALF to reduce the
incidence of spontaneous GI bleeding.
Management of infectious complications
Antimicrobial prophylaxis is often given because infection remains the primary cause of death in
patients with ALF. However, data analyses are limited on the benefit of antimicrobial prophylaxis
in ALF. A retrospective cohort study of 1551 patients with ALF showed that prophylactic antibiotic
therapy did not reduce the incidence of bloodstream infections (12.8% in the prophylaxis group vs.
15.7% in the non-prophylaxis group, p=0.12) and did not reduce 21-day mortality.
The 2023 ACG guidelines recommend against the routine use of prophylactic antimicrobials.
Patients should be monitored closely for infection through surveillance cultures, and antimicrobials
should be initiated promptly if the patient has any signs or symptoms of a systemic infection.
Empiric administration is recommended for any of the following scenarios:
Positive surveillance cultures
ii.
Progression to higher-grade encephalopathy
iii.
Refractory hypotension
iv.
Development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria