Infectious Diseases II
Ceftolozane is a novel fifth-generation cephalosporin.
ii.
Spectrum of activity: Gram-negative organisms, including P. aeruginosa. Activity includes
coverage against ESBL and AmpC Ξ²-lactamaseβproducing organisms. Limited gram-
positive and anaerobic coverage. Among multidrug-resistant and extended drugβresistant
Pseudomonas, ceftolozane/tazobactam retains good activity, with its MIC90 still below the
MIC breakpoint for resistant, as determined by the FDA.
iii.
FDA approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection, complicated UTI,
and hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, clinically, its coverage
will most likely be reserved for resistant pseudomonal infections. A recent study concluded
that high-dose ceftolozane/tazobactam (3 g every 8 hours) was noninferior to meropenem in
the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. Twenty-eight day mortality, clinical response, and
adverse reactions were similar between groups.
| d. | Aminoglycosides |
|---|
CLSI aminoglycoside breakpoint revisions
| (a) | CLSI breakpoints are not recognized by the FDA. |
|---|
ii.
Recommend tobramycin 7 mg/kg every 24 hours if expanding coverage for Pseudomonas.
| (a) | Gentamicin is no longer recommended for Pseudomonas. |
|---|---|
| (b) | Amikacin may be considered if being used for a urinary source. |
MRSA
MRSA is a significant cause of both community- and hospital-acquired infections.
Skin and soft tissue infections
Community-acquired MRSA often presents as a skin and soft tissue infection.
ii.
Cutaneous infections and abscesses are best treated with adequate drainage.
iii.
Antibiotics are usually not necessary unless the patient does not respond to drainage, has
extensive disease, or has signs and symptoms of systemic infection.
iv.
Antibiotic treatment choices for community-acquired MRSA cutaneous and skin infections
include trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, and tetracycline.
MRSA bacteremia and endocarditis
Can be treated with either vancomycin or daptomycin
ii.
In a study of patients with right-sided endocarditis, daptomycin was noninferior to vancomycin.
Of interest, treatment response was poor with both therapies, with only about 40% in each
group meeting the primary outcome of treatment success 42 days after the end of therapy.
Daptomycin was dosed at 6 mg/kg in this study.
iii.
Some experts recommend giving higher daptomycin doses (8β10 mg/kg) to optimize the PD
target attainment for daptomycin. Daptomycin resistance in S. aureus has been reported.
A correlation appears to exist between intermediate sensitivity to vancomycin, thought to
be caused by a thickened cell wallβlimiting penetration, and decreased susceptibility to
daptomycin. Currently, the daptomycin breakpoint MIC for MRSA is 1 mcg/mL or less.
iv.
Several investigations have also evaluated daptomycin compared with vancomycin for
MRSA bacteremia when the vancomycin MIC was greater than 1 mcg/mL. Although these
investigations showed outcome benefit associated with daptomycin use, the studies have
several limitations, which may limit their applicability.
| (a) | Retrospective analyses |
|---|---|
| (b) | Daptomycin was usually used as definitive therapy after an initial course of vancomycin. |
| (c) | Daptomycin use in one study was associated with a significantly higher rate of infectious |
diseases consultation, which may have other treatment implications.
| (d) | Given study limitations, the routine use of daptomycin for MRSA infections when the |
|---|
vancomycin MIC is greater than 1 mcg/mL cannot be recommended.