Index
Module 14 • Preventive Care
Supportive & Preventive Medicine
43%
Data Tables
Supportive & Preventive Medicine
Megan Feeney ~3 min read Module 14 of 20
17
/ 40

Supportive and Preventive Medicine

III.PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS OR PULMONARY EMBOLISM
A.Epidemiology
1
Reported occurrence of DVT is 10%–80% (J Crit Care 2002;17:95-104). Precise incidence in the

critically ill population is challenging because of inconsistencies in patient populations, different

diagnosis strategies, and variable study methodologies.

2DVT rates in the absence of prophylaxis vary, depending on the patient population.

In the absence of prophylaxis: 30% in medical-surgical patients, 50%–60% in trauma patients, up

to 80% in orthopedic surgical patients, and 20%–50% in neurosurgical patients (Arch Intern Med

2001;161:1268-79)

A randomized controlled trial of medical-surgical ICU patients receiving pharmacologic prophylaxis

found proximal DVT rates of 5%–6% using ultrasonography twice weekly for detection (N Engl J

Med 2011;364:1305-14).

B.Risk Factors
1

Malignancy, previous VTE, immobility, known thrombophilia, recent (1 month or less) surgery or

trauma, older age (70 or older), heart or respiratory failure, sepsis, obesity (body mass index of 30

kg/m2 or more), pregnancy, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with a hemoglobin of 12 g/dL or more,

hormonal therapy, recent transfusions of concentrated clotting factors, central venous lines, and long-

distance travel (Chest 2012;141:S195-226)

2Additional VTE risk factors in critically ill patients: A single-center prospective cohort (n=261)

identified four independent risk factors for ICU-acquired VTE: personal or family history of VTE

(multivariate hazard ratio [HR] 4.0; 95% CI, 1.5–10.3; p=0.004), end-stage renal failure (HR 3.7; 95%

CI, 1.2–11.1; p=0.02), platelet transfusion (HR 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2–8.4; p=0.02), and vasopressor use (HR

2.8; 95% CI, 1.1–7.2; p=0.03) (Crit Care Med 2005;33:1565-71).
3

In the critically ill population, there are no validated risk assessment models to estimate the risk of

VTE.

C.Prevention of VTE in the General Critically Ill Patient Population
1

Routine ultrasound screening is not recommended (Chest 2012;141:S195-226).

2Prophylactic use of inferior vena cava filters is not recommended (Chest 2012;141:S195-226).
3

Mechanical VTE prophylaxis should be used in a critically ill patient if the patient is bleeding or at

high risk of bleeding. Once the bleeding risk abates, pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis can be initiated.

Intermittent pneumatic compression devices and graduated compression stockings (GCS)

significantly reduce the risk of symptomatic VTE compared with no prophylaxis (Chest

2012;141:S195-226).

A Cochrane review evaluated the results from 19 studies of GCS (Cochrane Database Syst Rev

2014;12:1-72).

DVT rates were 9% in the GCS group and 21% in the control group (OR 0.33; p<0.00001), and

pulmonary embolism rates were 2% in the GCS group and 5% in the control group (OR 0.38;

p=0.04).

ii.

The patient population was largely limited to those undergoing orthopedic and general surgery.

Data are limited in medical critically ill patients.

Ψ΄Ψ±Ψ­ Ψ§Ω„ΩΩŠΨ―ΩŠΩˆ Ψ§Ω„ΨͺΨΉΩ„ΩŠΩ…ΩŠ β€” Ω…Ψ²Ψ§Ω…Ω†Ψ© Ω…ΨΉ Ψ§Ω„Ω€ PDF
Ψ¨Ψ―Ψ‘ Ψ§Ω„ΨͺΨ΄ΨΊΩŠΩ„ Ω…Ω†: Ψ§Ω„Ψ―Ω‚ΩŠΩ‚Ψ© 16 فΨͺΨ­ ΨΉΩ„Ω‰ YouTube