Infectious Diseases I
gram-negative bacilli and yeast (Answer A is incorrect).
Empiric antimicrobial therapy is indicated for suspected
infected pancreatitis. Extended-spectrum carbapenems,
which achieve relevant pancreatic fluid concentrations,
are effective in the management of infected pancreatitis.
Addition of anti-candidal therapy is indicated, given the
presence of yeast on the Gram stain (Answer D is cor-
rect; Answers B and C are incorrect).
This patient is thought to have fulminant (IDSA 2017)
CDI, given his recent exposure to broad-spectrum
antibiotic therapy, signs of infection, CT findings, and
the presence of hypotension. Combination therapy with
metronidazole and enteral vancomycin is indicated
(Answers A and D are incorrect). The presence of
ileus requires consideration of adding intracolonic
vancomycin because of possible impaired delivery to
the colon through enteral routes (Answer B is correct;
Answer C is incorrect).
The patient in this case presents with what is likely an
initial-episode, severe CDI, as supported by new-onset
diarrhea and clinical signs and symptoms of infection.
Of note, the patient is not hypotensive and has a lactate
below 2β4 mmol/L, suggesting the absence of shock or
other defining features of fulminant CDI; thus, mono-
therapy with enteral vancomycin is the best available
answer (Answer D is correct). Although the 2021 IDSA/
SHEA focused guideline update recommends fidaxomi-
cin for non-fulminant, first-episode CDI, oral/enteral
vancomycin is an acceptable alternative, especially if
fidaxomicin is unavailable. Combination therapy with
oral/enteral vancomycin and intravenous metronidazole
should be reserved for a complicated CDI (Answer C
is incorrect), and intravenous metronidazole is not rec-
ommended (Answer B is incorrect). The combination
of metronidazole and intracolonic is recommended for
patients with a complicated CDI and concern for ileus or
inability to deliver oral/enteral vancomycin to the colon
(Answer A is incorrect).
For an initial severe episode of CDI, the guidelines
recommend that the patient receive either fidaxomi-
cin or vancomycin for 10 days (Answer B is correct).
A duration of 14 days could be considered for patients
receiving metronidazole when vancomycin or fidaxomi-
cin is unavailable (Answer C is incorrect). Duration of 5
days or 4 weeks is not supported for the initial treatment
of CDI (Answers A and D are incorrect).
Necrotizing fasciitis is a severe, life-threatening
infection that is often polymicrobial. Prompt surgical
debridement of necrotic tissue and broad-spectrum
antibiotic therapy are the mainstays of initial therapy.
Agents active against S. pyogenes, MRSA, and aerobic
and anaerobic gram-negative bacilli should be initiated
empirically, together with adjunctive clindamycin
added, which may decrease bacterial toxin production.
The empiric regimen of piperacillin/tazobactam,
vancomycin, and clindamycin is most appropriate, given
the severity of infection despite the absence of traditional
multidrug-resistant organism risk factors (Answer C
is correct). Penicillin G is not broad enough (Answer
B is incorrect), and the combination of ceftaroline and
vancomycin does not contain clindamycin (Answer A is
incorrect). Combination of clindamycin and linezolid do
not include empiric gram-negative coverage. (Answer D
is incorrect).
The intraoperative cultures of this patientβs necrotizing
infection are of concern for S. pyogenes. S. pyogenes
produces exotoxin, which is associated with tissue
necrosis. Although bactericidal antibiotic therapy
is necessary for eradicating S. pyogenes, adjunctive
clindamycin may decrease toxin production, which could
limit the extent of tissue necrosis (Answer B is correct).
Vancomycin should be reserved for patients with an S.
pyogenes infection who have a Ξ²-lactam allergy because
Ξ²-lactam resistance is rare (Answer C is incorrect).
Moreover, synergistic antibiotic therapy with gentamicin
is not needed, given the effectiveness of gram-positive
Ξ²-lactams against S. pyogenes (Answer A is incorrect).
The role of IVIG in streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis is
controversial. A small randomized, placebo-controlled
trial β stratified on the basis of need for surgery and
clindamycin treatment β showed no improvement in
survival or reduction in the time to no further progression
of necrotizing fasciitis or cellulitis in 21 patients with
streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. As such, the
guidelines do not recommend IVIG until additional
studies are available (Answer D is incorrect).