Index
Module 2 • Research Methods
Research Design, Biostatistics & Literature Evaluation
13%
Data Tables
Research Design, Biostatistics & Literature Evaluation
Julie E. Farrar ~4 min read Module 2 of 20
4
/ 32

Research Design, Biostatistics, and Literature Evaluation

4

An epidemiologic study seeks to determine the

impact of adverse drug events in the intensive care

unit (ICU) on patient outcomes, which have an esti-

mated incidence of 52%. Which would be the best

approach to conducting this study?

A.Randomized controlled trial with a test for con-

tinuous variables to determine the difference in

outcomes.

B.Retrospective case-control study with a test

for proportions to determine the difference in

outcomes.

C.Prospective observational study with survival

analysis to determine the difference between

cohorts.

D.Retrospective cohort study with a test for

proportions to determine the difference in

outcomes.

5

A case-control study is conducted to deter-

mine whether proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is

associated with an increased risk of developing

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). The final

analysis shows the odds ratio (OR) for CDI with PPI

exposure to be 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI],

0.8–1.5). Which best describes the results?

A.PPI exposure increases the risk of CDI by

130%.

B.PPI exposure reduces the risk of CDI by 20%.
C.PPI exposure increases the risk of CDI by 30%.
D.PPI exposure is not associated with an increased

risk of CDI.

6

A systematic review evaluated the effect of albu-

min for fluid resuscitation. A meta-analysis that

evaluated the effect of albumin use compared

with normal saline on 28-day mortality reported a

combined OR of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.3–0.75) for the

treatment of hypovolemic shock caused by trauma.

For the treatment of septic shock, albumin com-

pared with normal saline resulted in a combined OR

of 1.1 (95% CI, 0.98–1.21) when evaluating 28-day

mortality. Which best represents the findings of the

review?

A.Albumin increased mortality in trauma but

did not affect survival in the treatment of

septic shock.

B.Albumin increased survival in trauma but

did not affect survival in the treatment of

septic shock.

C.Albumin did not affect survival in the treat-

ment of hypovolemic shock caused by trauma

but improved survival in the treatment of

septic shock.

D.Albumin did not affect survival in the treatment

of hypovolemic shock caused by trauma or

septic shock.

7

A critical care pharmacist is faced with an acute

drug shortage in which no furosemide is available

for immediate use in patient care. During patient

care rounds in the ICU, the decision is made to

implement a fluid-conservative strategy for a patient

with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

The critical care pharmacist procures an allotment

of bumetanide. Which statement best describes the

course of action for this patient?

A.The pharmacist uses an understanding of the

medical literature and experiential knowledge

to develop a titration scheme using bumetanide

to achieve a central venous pressure of less than

4 mm Hg.

B.The pharmacist uses an understanding of

research trial design and experiential knowl-

edge to develop a titration scheme using

bumetanide to achieve a central venous pres-

sure of less than 4 mm Hg.

C.The pharmacist uses a friendly rapport to con-

vince the nephrologist to treat this patient with

hemodialysis to achieve a goal central venous

pressure of less than 4 mm Hg.

D.The pharmacist uses an understanding of

research ethics to obtain informed consent

from the patient’s surrogate for treatment with

bumetanide.

HD Video Explanation β€” Synchronized with PDF
Starts at: minute 3 Open on YouTube