Pulmonary Disorders II
3 Wood units and an mPAP greater than 25 mm Hg. Although the definition of PAH now includes
those with an mPAP of 20 to 25 mm Hg and a PVR of 2 to 3 Wood units, these populations have not
been included in clinical trials to date assessing PAH pharmacotherapies and remain an area for future
research.
Drug therapy should be evaluated on the basis of the patient-specific factors below (Eur Respir J.
2024;64(4):2401324; Eur Heart J 2022;43:3618-731):
Mortality risk assessment using the 3-strata model (low, intermediate, high), as shown in
| (a) | To determine risk category, each variable available is categorized a point value as 1 point |
|---|
(low risk), 2 points (Intermediate risk), or 3 points (high risk). The total score is added
and divided by the number of variables assessed. Patients are classified as having low-,
intermediate-, or high-risk disease if their scores are less than 1.5, 1.5 to 2.49, or more than
2.49, respectively (Eur Respir J. 2024;64(4):2401323).
ii.
Presence of cardiopulmonary comorbidities that are associated with increased risk of LV
diastolic dysfunction (obesity, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease)
iii.
Ability and willingness to manage parenteral prostacyclins
iv.
Access to resources
Initial therapy in patients without cardiopulmonary comorbidities
Low- or intermediate-risk strata (Table 4): combination therapy with an endothelin receptor
antagonist (ERA) and a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i)
| (a) | Recommended combinations are tadalafil and ambrisentan or tadalafil and macitentan (N |
|---|
Engl J Med. 2015;373:834-844; Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(4):473-484).
ii.
High-risk strata: combination therapy with ERA, PDE5i, and parenteral prostacyclin
Initial and subsequent therapy in patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidities: because these
patients are under-represented in clinical studies, no evidence-based recommendations can be
provided. Although these patients are often treated similarly in practice, they have more treatment-
related adverse effects or tolerability issues with combination therapy.
All risk strata: oral monotherapy with PDE5i or ERA
ii.
Follow-up therapeutic changes should be based on patient-specific characteristics
Subsequent therapeutic options are based on the four strata risk assessment (Table 5). All 3 variables are
recommended to be included in each follow-up assessment for better accuracy at predicting mortality.
If only 2 variables are available, it is preferred to include 1 biomarker (BNP or NT-proBNP) and 1
functional marker (either WHO-FC or 6MWD). To determine risk category, each variable available is
categorized a point value as 1 point (low risk), 2 points (intermediate-low risk), 3 points (Intermediate-
high risk), or 4 points (high risk). The total score is added and divided by the number of variables
assessed. Patients are classified as having low-, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, or high-risk
disease if their scores are less than 1.5, 1.5 to 2.49, 2.5 to 3.49, or more than 3.49, respectively (Eur Respir
592).
Low-risk strata: Continue current therapy
Intermediate/Low-risk strata
Add an oral or inhaled prostacyclin receptor agonist (PRA)βorβ
ii.
Switch from PDE5i to soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator (sGC)βorβ
iii.
Add an activin-signaling inhibitor (N Engl J Med. 2023;388(16):1478-1490).