Hepatic Failure/GI/Endocrine Emergencies
Nutrition
Historically, patients were kept NPO in order to rest the pancreas and prevent the further release of
pancreatic enzymes. Patients were given TPN until complete resolution of AP.
This practice has largely fallen out of favor because several studies have shown that early
(within 24β48 hours) enteral nutrition is safe and effective for patients with AP. In addition,
a recent meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials concluded that early (within 24β48 hours)
feedings were not associated with increased adverse effects and may reduce hospital length of
stay, particularly for mild to moderate AP. Enteral feeding maintains the gut mucosal barrier
and helps prevent infectious complications such as infected necrosis, which may result from
bacterial translocation from the gut.
ii.
A meta-analysis of eight trials comparing enteral nutrition with TPN in patients with AP showed
decreased mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.5; 95% CI, 0.28β0.91), infectious complications
(RR 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23β0.65), multiorgan failure (RR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37β0.81), and surgical
interventions (RR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29β0.67) with the use of enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition
in these trials was given by the NJ route.
iii.
TPN is mainly reserved for patients unable to meet caloric demands with enteral feeding.
Although the NJ route for enteral feeding has been preferred because it avoids the gastric area
where pancreatic enzyme stimulation may occur, the NG route appears to be safe.
A recent meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials showed no significant differences
in mortality, tracheal aspiration, or proportion meeting energy balance between the two routes;
however, the results were limited by small sample sizes.
ii.
NG feeding is easier than NJ feeding because NJ tubes can be difficult to place, expensive, and
inconvenient. However, there is concern that NG feeding may increase the risk of aspiration
pneumonitis, particularly in patients with a history of aspiration.
Surgery
Cholecystectomy should be performed in patients with gallstones retained in the gallbladder to
prevent the recurrence of AP. For necrotizing biliary AP, cholecystectomy should be delayed until
inflammation is resolved and fluid collections are cleared in order to avoid infection.
Surgery is generally unnecessary for asymptomatic patients with pseudocysts and pancreatic or
extrapancreatic necrosis.
Surgical debridement of sterile necrosis is only necessary if gastric outlet obstruction or bile duct
obstruction is present.
| d. | Surgical intervention is the treatment of choice for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. |
|---|
For stable patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis, surgical debridement should be
delayed for at least 4 weeks to allow appropriate delineation of necrotic versus non-necrotic
tissue, and antibiotics should be tried before surgical intervention.
ii.
Unstable patients with infected necrosis should undergo immediate debridement, and
necrosectomy may be required in patients who do not respond to a combination of antibiotics
and debridement.